Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
amastro · Amateur Astronomy Mailing List
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 20309 - 20338 of 21516   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
20309
I'm just curious, what's the smallest aperture anyone has seen the very faint globular cluster NGC 7492 in Aquarius? I haven't seen it since August 2003, and...
kentblackwell
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2007
2:24 pm
20310
Hi Kent, ... I've seen it with my 6" newt at 51x. I recorded it as a faint fuzz with a star at the east edge. Clear skies, Wouter -- People: "If she weighs the...
Wouter van Reeven
wvreeven
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2007
2:42 pm
20311
I'm sure this isn't the smallest aperture that will respond but here's an old observation I made with a C-8. I'm guessing a 4"-6" would do the trick? 8"...
Steve Gottlieb
steven_gottlieb
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2007
9:10 pm
20312
I picked it up in 1990 from Anderson Mesa with my 15cm refractor at 50x. The low surface brightness will be the problem for most folks. \Brian...
Brian Skiff
bas@...
Send Email
Oct 1, 2007
9:14 pm
20313
For the last few years(at least when I remember) I've been working on observing all of the Globular Clusters listed in the Cambridge Star Atlas using 6 inches...
billweir110
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2007
4:45 am
20314
I know of a non observation of that guy in a 25 incher from Columbus, Texas east of Houston on a wet night two weeks ago while it was still somewhat low. ...
Kenneth Drake
oortdrako
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2007
11:27 am
20315
Hi Kent & All, The smallest aperture I've seen it in was 25cm and it was not an easy object at x138 or x176 under an excellent rural, but not pristine sky....
Les Dalrymple
ngcles
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2007
12:21 pm
20316
Evidently my earlier post did not come through. I viewed it in 1990 from Anderson Mesa with my 15cm refractor. I found it easy to spot at only 50x, though...
Brian Skiff
bas@...
Send Email
Oct 2, 2007
4:21 pm
20317
Seeing Brian's note about viewing NGC 7492 in 1990 made me research my own notes. Oddly, the first time I at least LOGGED this object was also in 1990, on...
kentblackwell
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2007
7:04 pm
20318
... It may be slightly brighter at the Mesa now than in 1990, but I simply haven't looked for it since then. If I get a chance, I'll try it with the Pronto...
Brian Skiff
bas@...
Send Email
Oct 2, 2007
7:41 pm
20319
Last sunday evening, Dana Patchick found a nice planetary nebula candidate while examining on-line POSS plates. It is at (2000) 17 09 38.6 -09 00 41, and has...
Kent Wallace
kwwallace@...
Send Email
Oct 2, 2007
11:54 pm
20320
Howdy all; If you are ready to take an observing break, this is an easy object to locate. Put Delta AQR in the field of a low power eyepiece, turn off the ...
Steve Coe
stevecoeaz2001
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2007
12:29 am
20321
I agree this is the visible counterpart to IRAS 17069-0857, but it is listed as a galaxy in various places. From the data available through VizieR, I'd say...
Brian Skiff
bas@...
Send Email
Oct 3, 2007
2:53 am
20322
I always find it interesting to compare the brightness of such suspects on the different plates that are provided at the DSS Plate Finder of the STSCI ( the...
Matthias Kronberger
cybermudl
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2007
7:54 am
20323
Hi Brian, I checked NED and they just had the IRAS object without any classification other than being an infrared source. SIMBAD also had the IRAS object...
Kent Wallace
kwwallace@...
Send Email
Oct 3, 2007
2:48 pm
20324
I agree with Matthias that the signs are from the various images that this has a good chance of being a planetary or possibly a compact HII region. The one...
Brian Skiff
bas@...
Send Email
Oct 3, 2007
4:29 pm
20325
Brian, Thanks for the tip on VizieR. It's a place I've never mucked around before. I'll have to learn how to use it properly. Kent ... From: Brian Skiff To:...
Kent Wallace
kwwallace@...
Send Email
Oct 3, 2007
5:04 pm
20326
... Not be belabor the point too much, here's a basic intro: http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR ... _much_too_large_. I would change it to 60...
Brian Skiff
bas@...
Send Email
Oct 3, 2007
5:47 pm
20327
The NGC 7331 group and Stephan's Quintet have been one of my favorite galaxy groups for years. Sue French has a nice article and a pair of fantastic photos of...
Stan H.
watchingthes...
Offline Send Email
Oct 5, 2007
1:27 am
20328
The area around NGC 7331 is close to my heart, too. I saw those "fuzzies" around NGC 7331 long ago; before any atlases available to me showed them. I was...
kentblackwell
Offline Send Email
Oct 5, 2007
1:11 pm
20329
The comet was easily spotted this morning, and I estimated him mag 7.8, so more brilliant than the efemerides! Little coma with a brilliant middle. David...
coldfieldboundary
coldfieldbou...
Offline Send Email
Oct 6, 2007
6:25 am
20330
Thanks for the observation, and glad to know this object is coming along nicely. Too bad I wasn't able to get any follow-up observations with a large...
Brian Skiff
bas@...
Send Email
Oct 6, 2007
6:36 am
20331
A search of the archives shows that not all years are equal for Hind's variable. I was wondering if anyone had observed it recently. Last night in poor...
gnowellsct
Offline Send Email
Oct 6, 2007
8:34 pm
20332
Hi Greg, My notes from February 2005 indicate that through a 28" scope Hind's Variable Nebual was quite faint and was best without a filter. I haven't had a...
Howard Banich
hbanich
Offline Send Email
Oct 7, 2007
1:24 am
20333
Hmmmmm. It sounds like I won't be seeing this in a 14" any time soon. thanks Greg N ... haven't had ... it was ... the only ... Hind's...
gnowellsct
Offline Send Email
Oct 7, 2007
3:07 am
20334
... I've observed it in 8-inch scope and 12.5-inch scopes without filters several years ago in pretty good skies in the Colorado Rockies. I have tried to look...
Roger N. Clark
visastro
Offline Send Email
Oct 7, 2007
6:41 am
20335
... Note worthy is the fact that T Tauri, the supposed source of the nebula's illumination, hasn't changed noticeably in brightness (+/- 0.2mg) over the past...
cnj999
Offline Send Email
Oct 7, 2007
1:22 pm
20336
As an addendum to my previous post and before someone jumps in here with the obscuring cloud concept sometimes used to explain the variations in T Tauri-like...
cnj999
Offline Send Email
Oct 7, 2007
2:32 pm
20337
Hi, John As you mention, no clear correlation between the brightness of T Tauri and the visibility of the variable nebula(e) in the area has ever been...
Dave Riddle
galaktos30080
Offline Send Email
Oct 7, 2007
4:29 pm
20338
... minimum when Burnham and Barnard recovered Hind's nebula using the Lick 36" refractor in 1890. A far cry from Hind's discovery observation when he found it...
cnj999
Offline Send Email
Oct 7, 2007
5:55 pm
Messages 20309 - 20338 of 21516   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help