Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
amastro · Amateur Astronomy Mailing List
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 16507 - 16536 of 21500   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
16507
Viewed Palomar 9/NGC 6717 last night in my 12" and am interested as to why it was included in the Palomar list since most are tiny very loose globulars and not...
Cliff Hedgepeth
k4mld
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
2:59 pm
16508
... Isn't it? What's interesting to me is the apparent uneven illumination of the cluster (at least that's how it looks to me). Taken from my TSP 2004 notes : ...
Len Philpot
lphilpot01
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
3:26 pm
16509
Just wanted to give a quick update on Lowell Star Party III. Both Thursday and Friday nights were clear, with about 50 at the observing site on Thursday and 80...
billferris2003
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
6:12 pm
16510
... On Mars Hill, a few miles from the star party site, at the other end of the same lava flow, I thought the seeing was quite good Thursday using the Clark...
Brian Skiff
brian.skiff@...
Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
6:33 pm
16511
... This calculator seems to indicate that the older you get, the deeper your limiting magnitude is. (?) -Alex...
Alex Langoussis
ngc38102000ew
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2005
5:02 pm
16512
... Yeah, I think that's a bug. I don't think it was carefully tested. It also says that given a reflector and refractor of the same aperture the reflector...
Greg Crinklaw
capellasoft
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2005
5:20 pm
16513
... I haven't read that S&T article, only the 1990 paper "Telescopic Limiting Magnitudes", so I don't know the equations used in the program. But one ...
Nils Olof Carlin
nilsolofcarlin
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2005
6:19 pm
16514
Nils Olof, The url is: ...
Jan van Gastel
janvangastel
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2005
6:58 pm
16515
... That's correct: a refactor does not see as faintly as a reflector. Given a constant % of reflectivity, the limiting magnitude of a reflector scales as the...
Mel Bartels
mel_bartels
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2005
8:14 pm
16516
Hi, ... That's an interesting possibility (I'm still thinking about it) but I think there is a more simple explanation: not all the variables here are ...
Greg Crinklaw
capellasoft
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2005
10:10 pm
16517
Hi Mel, ... Very interesting! I'm not a much of a refractor person so I didn't know this. Yet, as far as I can see the Schaeffer model doesn't take the loss...
Greg Crinklaw
capellasoft
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2005
10:19 pm
16518
Greg, I really touched off a controversy, here. The calculator does appear to have some slight errors (fortunately, resulting in small discrepancies). A...
pensack1
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2005
11:09 pm
16519
... Well, that's questionable. Modern small aperture refactors have better transmission characteristics than the typical small aperture reflector. ... ...
Mel Bartels
mel_bartels
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2005
12:17 am
16520
I know we all are, but I dropped in one of them .5k widefields in the 14" last night and just about dropped out of my seat. I mean, I've spent a lot of time...
gnowellsct
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2005
2:13 am
16521
Well Mel when you say "typical small aperture reflector" do you mean the budget ones sold to newbies or one of the more optimized instruments that would likely...
gnowellsct
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2005
2:21 am
16522
Nice drawing of Pal 12. I did not indicate in my notes any elongation. I'll have to revisit that on. My last observation was in Aug of 1996. It has been...
Denis
denis0215n3
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2005
4:09 am
16523
I was using a 7mm type 6 Nagler (214x) with an Orion XT12i. Really neat. Still can't figure why it was included in the Palomar list. Cliff ... illumination of ...
Cliff Hedgepeth
k4mld
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2005
4:10 am
16524
... I think my observation was with a 9mm Nagler @ 185x. ... I suspect Barbara might be our best bet here for an answer to that. :-) -- Len Philpot...
Len Philpot
lphilpot01
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2005
4:21 am
16525
Also seems to mean that as you become a more mature amatuer it helps to get bigger telescopes to fight back against aged eyeballs. I suspect young teens ( and...
Tony Buckley
obsession50cm
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2005
6:07 am
16526
Seems it is necessary to "reverse-engineer" the program to understand the questionable results. The limiting "magnitude" of an incandescent point source as...
Nils Olof Carlin
nilsolofcarlin
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2005
8:28 am
16527
Heya The reason I asked my original question of limiting magnitude of 36" telescope was because I wanted to get first hand experiences of people who've...
Riku Henriksson
rikuhenriksson
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2005
11:17 am
16528
There is a database "Faintest Object Observed" on the BigDob group that you can study: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bigdob/database?method=reportRows&tbl=1 ...
gubbenimanen
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2005
12:46 pm
16529
... From: "gnowellsct" <tim71pos@...> ... Know what you mean.... the bright rectangle shows up really well in 200-inch Palomar pictures of M42 taken in...
Alister
aling@...
Send Email
Oct 3, 2005
3:04 pm
16530
Hi, ... Yes, that's exactly what I've been saying all along. ... I think you are right, but it may be only half the problem. I have a lot of experience with...
Greg Crinklaw
capellasoft
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2005
3:24 pm
16531
I wonder how the rectangular illumination is achieved. Ordinarily one thinks of light as dimming with radius and thus sort of a circular affair, i.e., the...
gnowellsct
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2005
3:33 pm
16532
I surfed for rectangular illuminated M42, but didn't find one. I did however find this: http://pk.darkhorizons.org/images/3d/m42-3d.jpg which is at least a...
gnowellsct
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2005
3:34 pm
16533
understood and agreed! Using the Desert Coyote Observatory 30" f4.46 I see 17th mag galaxies pretty routinely... 18th are tougher but have been seen. The...
Gary Myers
garyk9rx
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2005
4:04 pm
16534
Hi, ... I'm sorry this is a bit of a rant, but you touched a nerve. With all due respect you sound like one of those people says "it's just a theory" and then...
Greg Crinklaw
capellasoft
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2005
4:07 pm
16535
Greg; I believe what you want to find is the famous drawing that was made with the Harvard 15 inch refractor in the 19th century. I remember it showing that ...
Steve Coe
stevecoeaz2001
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2005
5:44 pm
16536
Greg, I think it is somewhere in between... I missed the statement of the original poster saying "I simply do not believe in it"... this I do not agree with (I...
Gary Myers
garyk9rx
Offline Send Email
Oct 3, 2005
5:45 pm
Messages 16507 - 16536 of 21500   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help